Jane eyre movie 2011 cast tv#
British TV next serialised Jane Eyre in 1963, with the character actor Richard Leech – an intimidating presence, he played Mr Murdstone in the BBC's 1966 version of David Copperfield – in the role. There were five American versions in the early Fifties (including one with Charlton Heston as Rochester) before the first British serialisation, in 1956, with Stanley Baker – then typecast as the boorish heavy – as Rochester. The real rush of Jane Eyre adaptations had to wait for the television age, Brontë's story being well-suited to the expansiveness of a TV series. This Jane Eyre might have been better off remaining silent: the tinny dialogue comes across more like a drawing-room comedy than a Gothic romance. The first sound version was filmed in 1934, starring Colin Clive, in supremely dodgy sideburns, and Virginia Bruce, whose expressive, kohl-rimmed eyes were made for the silent era. There were seven silent films made of Brontë's 1849 novel, including Orphan of Lowood. Please share your favorite film version of Jane Eyre.But back to the un-zombified screen renditions of Jane Eyre. With that being said, there is one Jane Eyre miniseries that I like more than this film. After comparing the two, I just feel more connected to the 2011 film. I like the way her story was portrayed and the chemistry between Fassbender and Wasikowska’s characters. I have to say that the 2011 Jane Eyre is my personal favorite. On another note, the settings were pretty in the film but I think overall they were lovelier in the 1996 adaptation. This was an important growing period for Jane that deserved focus and was given more time to develop here. You can see her happiness at discovering her new family and the awkward tension between her and St. You could just feel their connection.Īside from the love story, I liked the attention given to Jane’s interactions with the Rivers family.
![jane eyre movie 2011 cast jane eyre movie 2011 cast](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zfKPJHadsRY/maxresdefault.jpg)
You could tell the two had a growing passion with palpable chemistry to root for. The scene after Jane saves him from being burned to death with that almost-kiss had me swooning a little. Michael Fassbender’s Rochester didn’t have as many raw outbursts as Hurt’s, but you could feel the overwhelming emotions simmering underneath his arrogant facade. Then there was the undeniable romantic tension between Jane and Mr. I even appreciate the way the story was told as I felt more sympathetic to Jane. Her time at Thornfield was accurately portrayed and enough time was given to build the romantic plot. The film shared flashes of her most significant moments from childhood (i.e. This movie gives fair balance to each stage of Jane’s life. This Jane Eyre focused on the feelings of the characters more, and not just Jane and Rochester’s either. As I previously stated, this was the first Jane Eyre adaptation I viewed and I still love it despite a few misgivings. This huge plot line in the book was just tagged on as an afterthought. For example, they emphasized her childhood but barely showed her time with St. I also felt like this Jane Eyre was inconsistent in what it focused on and what it didn’t. I did think it was highly romantic at the time until I saw other versions that is. I did like Hurt’s raw reactions in the movie however. The romance is always intense in the novel, but I didn’t feel it as much onscreen. When it comes to the romance between Jane and Rochester, the portrayal was a bit milder in comparison to other adaptations. I like Jane’s acts of defiance because Anna Paquin is a total scene stealer as young Jane. Although it was not in the book, I love it when Jane cuts her hair in solidarity with Helen.
Jane eyre movie 2011 cast plus#
The focus on Jane’s childhood was another plus to the film.
![jane eyre movie 2011 cast jane eyre movie 2011 cast](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NuR8Hu2HYgI/TzCA00MazGI/AAAAAAAAArw/1ZlcsXqw9Gc/s1600/jane+eyre+promo.png)
As a comparison, I really liked the backdrop of this movie better. It brought the scenes from the novel into live action in a believable way. I was impressed with Charlotte Gainsborough’s quiet portrayal of Jane and the depictions of harsh life at Lowood School and the place that Thornfield was filmed. This was the first version of Jane Eyre I ever watched. I’m sure eventually there will be a latter article devoted to a couple of the mini-series available, but until then I have to say that both the 19 versions have their merits, including some fantastic acting. The second version is the 2011 film starring Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender. First up is the 1996 version starring Charlotte Gainsborough, William Hurt and a young Anna Paquin. For this comparison, however, I’ve decided to focus on just a couple of the Jane Eyre film adaptations this time around.
![jane eyre movie 2011 cast jane eyre movie 2011 cast](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-F-Np-k81dr8/UPxujLyK8MI/AAAAAAAAB2Q/EIM_nypFbOI/s1600/Jane-Eyre-poster-001.jpg)
And because Jane Eyre is adapted every few years or so, there are many great versions out there to delve into (such as the 2006 Mini-Series). Charlotte Bronte’s tale of Gothic romance and hidden secrets has delighted us for almost two centuries, including on the small and big screen.